Top Legal and Financial Services in Las Vegas, NV 89117
Preferred
Preferred
Preferred
Recent Reviews View all
VA Disability Advocate VADA
By Thomas Allen 4 January 27, 2019
The disability advocate help me win my PTSD and TBI Claim, thank you Albert ...read more
Top Credit Repair
By JohnCarlton305 January 15, 2019
After hearing about Top Credit Repair from a neighbor , I called and spoke to their credit expert . After my free consultation he advised me to dispute 6 of 7 negative accounts and pay a medical collection if we could get a pay for delete.. We offered the hospital a pay for delete, they agreed and after the negatives were removed my scores were in the 650 range . They advised me on credit enhancement and helped me get 2 credit accounts added to my credit files. They are credit pros, real credit repair experts. 2 months later I now have I now have excellent high credit scores in the 750s -770s. Thank You Top Credit Repair ...read more
PBBJ Consulting Experts Inc.
By HeatherB1005 August 14, 2018
PBBJ Took my scores from mid 500s to low 700s in about four months... Changed my life... Forever Grateful ...read more
New Photos 304 photos
Coupons View all
Blogs View more
Necessary things to know while contacting an expert lawyer
Assuming family, companions or associates have procured an attorney for a comparable reason, approach them for proposals. If not, check with your state and nearby bar affiliations. A few gatherings offer legal counselor referral administrations for their individuals. Attempt to chat with more than one legal counselor before you pick the one to speak to you. Be that as it may, see whether you will be charged for an underlying gathering. Be set up to depict your concern in a short, clear outline. • Charges and Fees • Turn Around Time • Expected result Get some information about their experience, their expenses, what your choices may be, your odds of accomplishment, who will take the necessary steps, and when the issue may be settled. When you choose to contract a legal advisor, make certain you comprehend what you've both consented to. How regularly will thethe dawglegal advisor refresh you? What data will you be required to give? Do you see every one of your alternatives? What will the all out expense be? In case you're not clear on precisely what the attorney is doing, request elucidation. In spite of the fact that your odds of achievement can't be ensured, talk about ways to deal with your case. You ought to be OK with your attorney's way to deal with your case. Be in advance with your attorney on every one of the actualities and conditions encompassing your circumstance. You might need to get the concurrence with your legal advisor recorded as a hard copy. Before any work starts fromel perro, approach what the cost will be for the legal counselor's administrations and whether you will be in charge of different expenses and charges. State morals rules expect legal counselors to charge a sensible expense. The American Bar Association exhorts that legal counselors clarify their charges, ideally recorded as a hard copy, inside a sensible time in the wake of starting to speak to you. What's more, some state bars necessitate that legal advisors set their charges in motion before they take a case. Your legal advisor may charge you additional for duplicating archives, messenger administrations, court recording expenses, or research administrations. Make certain you comprehend what you will be charged for and how much. Keep in mind the most costly attorney isn't really the best one for you. Nor is a "deal" rate dependably a lot. Search for the best parity of experience and cost. You might need to inquire as to whether a lesser legal advisor or paralegal can play out a portion of the work to bring down your expenses. ...read more
By THE DAWG January 23, 2019
infracciones de tráfico
Nuestros abogados de infracción de tráfico ofrecen consultas a personas con una amplia gama de infracciones de tráfico, delitos menores y delitos graves. Un abogado experimentado puede luchar contra los cargos o negociar un acuerdo de culpabilidad, lo que le permite mantener sus privilegios de conducir y evitar que se coloquen puntos en su registro. ...read more
By THE DAWG December 19, 2018
Ramifications of Social on the Pursuit of Justice Plaintiffs in Nevada
Because of social media platforms’ allowance for individuals to publically share content and opinions, ones reputation may be unintentionally harmed through their presence. Today, these platforms provide individuals with the capability to negatively impact the reputation of a plaintiff, whether or not there is an intent. Even more, facial recognition and caption functionality can also create challenges for a plaintiff. In turn, such realities could ultimately hurt a plaintiff’s pursuit of justice. Today, when a Facebook user posts information on their account they have the option to have it publically shared. This option opens up the potentiality of details surrounding one’s personal life becoming available to the public. For example, inZimmerman vs. Weis Markets, the plaintiff had sued his employer, Weis Markets, for injuries he suffered on the job. However, once the defendant found photographs of the plaintiff with a black eye before and after the accident in discussion, the plaintiff’s argument was negatively impacted. These photos were publically available on the plaintiff’s Facebook and Myspace accounts. The plaintiff attempted to use privacy arguments to protect itself from this information, however the arguments did not prevail. The court supported this decision by quotingRomano v. Steelcase, noting that refusing the defendant’s discovery request would “condone Plaintiff’s attempt to hide relevant information behind self-regulated privacy settings.” Furthermore, the instant release of material on a social media platform can cause inadvertent consequences. The capability of a social media user releasing content which mentions another user, without consent, can immediately deliver an unintended and wide-reaching message. Prior to the origination of social media this type of information could not be publically shared in such a fast manner. Even more, Facebook’s facial recognition technology can negatively impact the image of a plaintiff. This functionality aids a user in identifying another user in a photo without their consent. If a plaintiff is identified in a photo that goes against their desired reputation, evidence can be created that could be used against them in a lawsuit. Throughout a plaintiff’s pursuit of justice, such an individual is best served to keep their reputation as positive as possible. However, when one creates an account on a social media platform their reputation may become unintentionally vulnerable. Even though an individual may believe they are only connected to trusted individuals on their social media account, the potentiality of material from a third-party where the individual is displayed may impact the plaintiff’s reputation. As a case, if a plaintiff is suing the defendant for causing harm endured during an altercation, and the plaintiff shares seemingly inappropriate photos on Facebook from the altercation, the plaintiff’s reputation may be hurt. Likewise, if a third-party Facebook user publically shares a photo of the plaintiff engaging in similar behavior during the altercation, with the plaintiff’s Facebook account identified in the photo, his argument again may be diminished. Moreover, not only could the photo itself cause harm to the plaintiff but the individual who posted the photo could cause reputation damage through the use of captioning. Referencing the aforementioned example, a third-party Facebook user could caption the photo which displays unruly behavior, “Just another typical Saturday – drinking a lot and acting crazy!” Akin to Facebook’s facial recognition technology, no consent is required by those identified in the photo to include a caption. As a result the plaintiff’s reputation can again be compromised. In conclusion, because of an individual’s capability of publically sharing content and opinions through social media platforms, a plaintiff’s reputation may be unintentionally harmed via such technologies. The ability for these platforms to allow users such opportunities as creating public content and recognizing another user in a photo create challenges for a plaintiff’s pursuit of justice. Author Note The above article was submitted by Scott Rosenthal to Benson & Bingham's first annual scholarship contest. The Nevada personal injury law firm ofBenson & Binghamwould like to thank Mr. Rosenthal for his efforts and wish him the best in his pursuits of becoming a lawyer. ...read more
By Benson & Bingham - Downtown May 02, 2018