Top Notaries in Mesa, AZ 85209
Recent Reviews View all
Copperstate Investigations
By Anonymous August 13, 2014
Nitrocellulose、nitrocellulose solution、pigment http://www.xuanyiltd.com/ phone：86-0318-5111581 ...read more
Jennifer Hayes Mobile Notary Services
By joshdaniels663 July 04, 2014
We would like to say a big thank you for all the help we received on the sale of our house. A professional and speedy approach to all matters was given and constant updates on the situation was most beneficial. ...read more
Jennifer Hayes Mobile Notary Services
By belcastro2531 May 15, 2014
I was looking for a new accountant as I was unhappy with my current service. I wanted to find someone who wouldn’t leave me in the dark or make me feel like another name on the books.From our first session I knew that I had picked the right person. Jennifer Hayes Mobile Notary Services offers a personal service that is tailored to me and my business needs and I already feel more enlightened and in control of what I am doing. I am completely stisfied and wold like to recommend <com.> ...read more
New Photos 26 photos
Blogs View more
JP Mobile Notary for fast, friendly and licensed notary service.
JP Mobile Notary is Arizona, Maricopa County. We are licensed, bonded and insured. Commission number for Arizona is 556996. Member of the National Notary Association.We are a mobile notary public servicing the Mesa, Gilbert, Scottsdale,Tempe,Chandler, Apache Junction, Paradise Valley, San Tan Valley and Phoenix. We are granted friendly, fast and trusted. We also speak Español. ...read more
By JP Mobile Notary January 21, 2019
HARP 2.0? Helping or Delaying?
I have been wondering if HARP 2.0 is only delaying foreclosures or short sales. Just my thought. I have spoken to a number of people that have been going through thru this program and I have gotten mixed thoughts from them being so thankful that they are not losing their home to others that look at it as a way for them to save money temporary. Here is a link to see what HARP 2.0 is all about and to see if your loan is eligible http://themortgagereports.com/259/harp-making-home-affordable-guidelines ...read more
By AZ Signings May 16, 2012
Foreclosure abuse rampant
A report this week showing rampant foreclosure abuse in San Francisco reflects similar levels of lender fraud and faulty documentation across the United States, say experts and officials who have done studies in other parts of the country. The audit of almost 400 foreclosures in San Francisco found that 84% of them appeared to be illegal, according to the study released by the California city on Wednesday. "The audit in San Francisco is the most detailed and comprehensive that has been done - but it's likely those numbers are comparable nationally," Diane Thompson, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told Reuters. Across the country from California, Jeff Thingpen, register of deeds in Guildford County, North Carolina, examined 6,100 mortgage documents last year, from loan notes to foreclosure paperwork. Of those documents, created between January 2008 and December 2010, 4,500 showed signature irregularities, a telltale sign of the illegal practice of "robosigning" documents. One of the major problems that has emerged in the foreclosure crisis is that it is far from clear that many lenders foreclosing on properties actually own the loans and have the right to take action against them. In many cases during the housing bubble that burst in 2008, original mortgages were repackaged and sold to so many investors that it is now unclear who actually holds the loans. In the San Francisco study, which studied properties subject to foreclosure sales between January 2009 to November 2011, 45 per cent were sold to entities improperly claiming to be the owner of the loan. "It is not impossible that there are homeowners who are alleged to have defaulted on loans to which they never fully agreed to and, further, are being foreclosed upon by lenders that might not even own such loans," the report stated. One factor that probably caused the particularly high 84 per cent rate of illegal foreclosures in San Francisco is that California is a "non-judicial" foreclosure state. In other words, the foreclosure process does not need to be overseen by a judge. That left the conduct of lenders in California - one of the hardest-hit states in terms of foreclosures - largely unscrutinized until the robosigning scandal gained prominence in late 2010. In judicial foreclosure states such as New York, some judges have been taking banks to task for submitting faulty foreclosure paperwork. But Ray Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School and an expert in housing law, said foreclosure fraud had been as rampant in judicial states as non-judicial ones. "This number around 80% is not a number we have not seen before," Brescia said, referring to both the issuing of faulty loans during the housing bubble and the foreclosure crisis that followed. "There have been a very high level of irregularities across the country." ...read more
By AZ Signings March 11, 2012
Related Articles View more
